The title really sums this blog up quite succinctly. Pornster. Porn. That’s what I expected and that’s what I got.
Actually I was grateful for such am obvious title – I’d have hated to have unwittingly opened this blog when children/partner/colleagues were around. Be warned, this is definitely NOT a work-friendly site.
On opening the site I was immediately ‘greeted’ with a graphic shot of a naked woman. Every post consists of such a photograph, along with a couple of short sentences as to why the author likes that particular photo and, where applicable, a link back to the photo source.
It’s obvious that the author is passionate about his subject matter. More often than not the narrative is to-the-point, bordering on crude. This is certainly not an artistic or classy site. It’s porn at its most basic level. However, the author does make a point of showing pictures of girls that don’t necessarily fit the typical stereotype of a porn star. He chooses them based on his personal preferences which he outlines for us at the top of the page. It is updated daily, and with several posts a day.
The design is simple – I believe it’s a basic blogger template with one or two minor amendments. I suspect that the author has other things on his mind rather than worrying about his template. The same can probably be said of his visitors. The sidebar is long – there must be a hundred different links there and from what I can deduce all are to other porn sites. I must admit to not checking all of the links but the random ones I did check worked just fine.
The blog itself took a while to load, undoubtedly due to the large quantity of posts. But it loaded okay in both IE and Firefox. It seems that our author had been having some issues with it displaying in IE but these seem to be resolved now.
To summarise, this is definitely an adult-only site. By the looks of the site counter it seems to be very popular and for those looking for simple porn it will fit the bill. Nothing particularly noteworthy and it isn’t a site that I enjoyed but I can see that there are those that would.
NULL