This is a very serious weblog, based on online journalism and other, similiar, web-related news. If you’re just looking for a casual weblog, you’d be at the wrong place here, but that doesn’t mean you wouldn’t find anything interesting.
There’s plenty to read here, from reads about newspapers on the web, to profiting on the web.
Obviously, this weblog’s based on a more mature audience, and it’s seemingly been around for a while. In the “rants” section, you’ll find them dating back to 1997.
If you’re looking for advice on web-design, and news on Internet companies, then visit this weblog, but don’t expect to find out much about the author.Living Can Kill You
Review 142
I had a hard time getting into Will’s site. I read his posts and was unable to find too much to rave about. Except I did come across one post that I found interesting … yet disturbing which was about his need for his “knife”. Strange.
Anyway, it’s an average blog, might do well if there was a little more happening, but it’s a nice site for mundane thoughts.Dragon and Dog
Review 149
There is nothing fancy about phancy.com, which in this case is good. The simplicity of this site is part of what makes it great. No annoying elements whatsoever. The color is cool and non-distracting. The layout is very functional, leading the reader to what is important: the weblog content.
Reading the weblog, I was pleased to find many links to funny, entertaining websites. The author seems to stay on-top of finding the latest satire and wit on the internet, and passes it along in this easily readable weblog. The funny, random, and insane links within each log entry, coupled with the simply effective design, are what made this site so darn enjoyable.
Can’t complain too much about phancy.com. This one will definitely get a place in my prestigious Bookmarks list, as it should in yours.Phancy
Review 104
this site is what a weblog should be, informitive, humorous, and interesting, ChrisF has all these elements and more, I find ONCE AGAIN the lack of other content frustrating but then again this is a great website, the design is subdued but still manages to grab your attention, like a fleeting shadow on a dark night, and I found myself reading out of enjoyment more than out of scrutiny, still one feels void of knowing this unique individual almost like being left out of a joke, this site hasn’t lived up to it’s potential but is darned close,
this will become a great site if the author spends a little more time on itChrisF.net
Review 140
sometimes first impressions make a difference as was the case in this scenario. The site in review had a badly flawed design, the colors seemed out of place and the header clashed, whats more heartbreaking is that it was devoid basically of content even with the weblog, it was like a bad conversation and wanting to get out to explore greener pastures, it’s a shame because this writer had good insights and observations, but she never held onto them and rather just let them drift on bye, the reader also seems distant to the writer and never gets to know her. if the weblog is the first thing someone sees than it should stand out , unfortunetly I can’t say that about this website. which is sad because the writer seems like she has so much you’d like too hear geeKsuperstar.org