Review 3352

Casino Pulp is a blog geared towards those who enjoy table games such as Baccarat and Poker. The layout of the site is a standard blogger template with archive pages that make it easy to get around to the historical content. The site isn’t very flashy or thrilling, with a very simple and straightforward stick figure card player adorning the top banner.

Several of the articles are in Spanish, which made reading impossible for this monolingual reviewer. The “About” page is absolutely useless in learning more about the author and the source(s) of the content. However, I did learn how to play Baccarat thanks to the “About” page. Sweet. Now I can go rake in some money at Foxwoods!

The bulk of the pulp is casino news, industry news, insider information that doesn’t really HELP the novice or n00b player get in on the games and how they’re played.

I found the site boring and borderline useless. The site has archives for April and May so there is not a vast amount of content to read and review. I am not sure what the mission of the site is, or why it is even there, in English or in Spanish, and honestly couldn’t even recommend it as a resource for anything to friends who actually are WSOP fans or card players. I give this site a 2 rating. NULL

Review 3353

Tell Me Why? is the title of a series of books I had growing up in the early 70s. There were three or four books in the series, and I have one of them on my bookshelf today. As a child, I greatly enjoyed the books, and to this day remember looking out the window of the car as we drove through the night knowing why the moon was following us, all thanks to the “Tell Me Why?” books.

The blog “Tell Me Why?” is not from the same publishing company as the educational resource books of my childhood but the mission behind the blog is quite the same. Authored by an “R. Edmondson,” Tell Me Why? happily answers the little questions we all have in life, such as “Why do people burp?” and “How deep is the ocean?” The site is an easy to read and navigate blogger template, and there is little or no difficulty in getting around. R. Edmondson does not state where he’s from or how he knows all of these things, which immediately triggers suspicion on my part as a parent and a former educator.

Going back through the archives, I noticed that the October 2006 entries were put into place to establish the top level navigation topics such as Links and FAQs pages, as well as a page for webmasters to set up affiliate sites. The site is set up as an educational site, but really is a site for generating cash through affiliates and yahoo ads. Every entry has a yahoo ads section. Children who are unfamiliar with the internet will possibly be confused by why the yahoo ads are there in the first place on EVERY single entry.

Additionally, when one is looking at a site like Tell Me Why? and desires to research the topic further, one enjoys links to other resources. R. Edmondson provides links to Universal Facts, a website he also manages. There aren’t any links out to NASA or NOAA, or websites from which students should be obtaining primary source material. If I were currently an educator, I wouldn’t mind a student using Tell Me Why? to get ideas started for a paper, but doubt I would accept it as a primary source for my students’ research. The site encourages people to link to it. It would also be helpful if it linked to other sites outside of the R. Edmondson universe.

R. Edmondson states he has written all of the articles inside “Tell Me Why?”, and I have to believe he is the absolute font of all knowledge in the universe because I don’t see any sourcing for the information he presents. I find any website that does not source its content to be suspect in some way, shape or form. Additionally, there wasn’t no source information for the graphics used. As someone with a degree in technology education, I find that suspect and a not very careful way to present a site that expects other people not to infringe upon his own copyright.

Because it is fun to learn trivial things even into your 40s and because no one is giving me a scholarship to a major university based upon this “research paper,” I have to say that the content of the site was interesting enough to entertain me on a cold and rainy New England day. I give “Tell Me Why?” a 3 rating, and would encourage R. Edmondson to source his work a little better and reveal more of who he is and upon what authority he writes. That way, I can feel comfortable seeing my kids use his site to learn something.
NULL

Review 3351

“Mourn” is a powerful word and evokes images of great sadness and loss. Oftentimes, someone who keeps a blog may be mourning for his or her own life (or lack thereof) or the death of a family member or friend. Mourning a change in a relationship, whether internally due to change or externally due to a romantic break-up or death is something just about every culture has some experience with.

The title of the blog “Mourn for YeYe” is subtitled with the following: “A time has passed since former “YeYe” died, leaving Tantiratapong family to ponder the man and his legacy. But YeYe (Mr. Serm) has not faded into the historical shadows, and the family’s heart is still with him.”

Our author has set up a blogspot site to commemorate the life of “YeYe,” or Mr. Serm. I presume this is a family member. But that is never explained through the “about” page, or through any of the entries. The very first entry in October of 2006 features a photograph of Mr. Serm. But the author does not say “My grandfather just passed away” or “My uncle has died…” so we as readers are left to wonder the nature of the relationship. Suffice to say, someone passed on and the keeper of the blog has decided to set up a memorial to the individual.

Sounds nice. But it isn’t really. This isn’t a loving tribute to a dead relative, unless your idea of “loving tribute” means plagiarized content dumped into a blog. What we have here is a collection of text culled from many different sources across the internet, from wikipedia to poemhunter.com, outlining the process of disposal of human bodies and traditions surrounding the handling of the dead. Each entry is embellished with a photograph (or photographs) taken from the web.

We can tell pretty much immediately by reading that the writer is simply cutting and pasting content into one this one location, and the lack of proper (or any) sourcing is disturbing. My high school English teacher, J.J. MacGillicuddy, is rolling in his grave right now.

Traditions of Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism are outlined in one entry, and then “what happens when your body is cremated” follows. Different options of what to do with the ashes, from burial at sea to creating a “diamond” from the remains are outlined.

There is one entry where the writer wishes us a happy new year. Aside from the first entry where the name of the deceased is written out, this seems to be the only entry written by the blog author.

While it is educational and interesting to read all about what happens to a body during his or her cremation process, I hardly think that copying and pasting content about funerary processes is necessary. I fail to see the point and fail to understand exactly how the Tantiratapong family is dealing with the loss of YeYe. We all deal with mourning in our own way. My heart goes out to anyone who has lost a relative and tries to find ways to properly deal with the loss. So it is difficult for me to really thrash this blog and the writer. I see no purpose in this blog, or a future for it once all of the sources on the web have been cut, and pasted, and improperly sourced. I see no future for its existence, unless the writer plans to write about YeYe and his thoughts and feelings surrounding the loss.

The entire thing reads like a research paper done for a 10th grade science class, and that is sad. I would have rather known more about YeYe so I can also join in mourning him. I give a rating of 2.25, and wish the blog owner well in his mourning process. NULL

Review 3355

Last time I checked, this website that you’re reading right now was called The Weblog Review. Now, for me, that means we review these things called weblogs (or blogs). Maybe you’ve heard of them.

The name of this site is FusionCharts for Blogs – Animated flash charts, and I guess it didn’t really sound like a weblog from the start, but I decided to give it a chance. And guess what? It’s not a weblog at all and there’s not a blog hiding anywhere at all.

The products on the site seem like they’d definitely benefit a blog, and adding a weblog into the site would be a great idea to help readers know about the development process of it all. With addition of an actual blog, I’d be able to rank this site a lot higher. Without? It doesn’t really fall into the type of site that’s reviewed here at all.

NULL

Review 3355

I really had no clue what to expect with FusionCharts for Blogs so lets just get to it. When I first got to the site, I didn’t find a link to a blog, in fact, I only saw 3 links – “Get Started”, “How to use”, and “About”. No blog.

Well since they decided to use our Pay Per Review option I feel obliged to at least give the site a review of some sorts. The design of the site is a nice web 2.0 type site. Rounded corners, smooth gradients and nice big easy fonts are all a plus.

I read the about section. Basically FusionCharts allows you to create nice 3d charts for your blog, google page, pretty much any web page. From what I understand you can use it with any programming language and any database. Other than that, I don’t know to much else.

I didn’t go through the instruction manual because I am not going to test out the product. I am not going to review said project. I review blogs and as I said earlier since the author decided to use the Pay Per Review option I would at least review the website. The site looks nice, and it functions like it should for a product site. Will you use the product? Doubt it. This site could benefit from a blog where they show it in action and give demos. Take the manual and turn it into a blog of sorts and boom – good blog site. But since there is not blog and I am just reviewing the site – I give it a 1.NULL